Twitter becoming a real platform ...

Twitter is becoming a real platform. I don't know if it really needs to limit things to 140 characters, but people are certainly using it for some interesting applications. Lately, I've been using TwitterFeed to blast content out from my RSS stream of news, hashtags to make things interesting for readers, TweetSum to check on potential followers, Twitter Grader to check on potential followers, and now Twitter Fountain to animate current tweets. If you'd like to embed a twitter fountain in your own page or blog, try this embed code:



I may be old fashioned (or just old), but what I really want is to be able to create and manage a list of pages/blogs/search terms, and get e-mailed every time there is a change or addition. I'd like a summary of the change in the e-mail, with enough text/image to get the context, and a link back to the original. Maybe even a "diff" function or "history" like with Wikipedia. E-mail is a lot easier for me to organize, search, archive, and transfer than RSS or tweets.

Anyone willing to build such a tool? Anyone know where I can get such a tool? Thanks ...

Where can you follow all the key developments in the enterprise software and solutions market?

Where can you follow all the key developments in the enterprise software and solutions market?

Right here!

You can read this blog online at dbmoore.blogspot.com, or subscribe to this blog via e-mail at http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=1252427&loc=en_US, or read it on your RSS reader at http://dbmoore.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default, or get the feed with tags and summaries on del.icio.us at http://delicious.com/dennisbmoore (http://feeds.delicious.com/v2/rss/dennisbmoore for the RSS feed), or follow me on twitter at http://twitter.com/dbmoore, or search the twitter hashtag #EnterpriseTweets. Is that enough ways to publish? Fortunately, services like FeedBurner and TwitterFeed and Del.icio.us and Blogspot make all this syndication easy!

Anyone with any other suggestions of ways to publish this news aggregate, feel free to suggest them to me here in the comments ... thanks!

What will Oracle do with Java?

As you probably know if you read this blog, Oracle (ORCL) has agreed to acquire Sun (JAVA) for about $5.6 billion net of Sun's cash. This acquisition has set off a storm of speculation about what Oracle will do with various Sun assets once the acquisition closes as expected.

Oracle's Larry Ellison focused on Java in describing the rationale for the investment, saying "Java is the single most important software we've ever acquired." While there have been conspiracy theories that Oracle bought Sun to kill MySQL, or as a favor to his friend Scott McNealy, public companies just don't work that way - Oracle picked up a lot of valuable assets in the acquisition, and clearly Java is one of the most significant.

What should Oracle do with Java? Well, as a public company in what is still at least purportedly a free-market economy, Oracle should use Java to maximize shareholder value. But how? Can Oracle learn from the mistakes made by Sun in running the Java ecosystem? After all, it is a well-known Silicon Valley joke that Sun's software strategy is to buy all the software companies who do not run on Windows, and kill them (Netscape, NetDynamics, Forte, ...).

Clearly, Sun did not use Java or its other software assets effectively to maximize shareholder value. And just as clearly, Oracle thinks it can do so better.

• Oracle should develop a better mechanism for monetizing Java than did Sun. I'll come back to this one.
• Oracle should clarify who it is targeting with Java. Today, Java positioning is a mess - and this has led to a product architecture that is far too complex and simultaneously unsatisfying for many developers. Oracle should jettison a lot of the "cruft" that has built up on Java under Sun's stewardship.
  
• Once Oracle is clear on which developers it is targeting with Java, it should simplify the product suite for those developers. For example, the core product should be simple, complete, and useful across a broad range of deployment options. Then, there should be dedicated product sets for classes of developers, such as embedded device developers, server-side enterprise application developers, web site/property "cloud" developers, and desktop client-side developers. A good developer targeting one of these platforms should be able to learn and use the suite effectively in a couple of days, and should reach a reasonable level of expertise in less than a month. Other issues of concern to these developers, such as performance, size, portability, etc. should be addressed quickly.
  
• Oracle should clarify which related components are "in," and which are "out." For example, Oracle should make clear which development environment(s) will Oracle support, or enable support for. And which third party or open source projects (e.g. OSGi) will Oracle support.
• Once Oracle is clear on who it is serving, and has a roadmap to do so, then it can look at competitors using Java much the same way Microsoft looks at Windows ISVs. Although Microsoft wants to crush these competitors in their respective businesses (through superior product offerings), it also wants to learn from them how to better serve them - this makes the entire Windows ecosystem more powerful and has allowed Windows to overcome competitors in many markets. Oracle should do the same with its newly expanded ecosystem. And in doing so, it will find opportunities to improve monetization and drive shareholder value.

But "what Oracle should do with Java" is not the subject of this blog entry. The subject is "what will Oracle do with Java." With Oracle's excellent track record of acquisitions, it seems obvious that Oracle will do with Java what it should. Expect Oracle to make Java much more attractive to developers by better understanding software developers.